United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Richmond Division)
Case No. 3:22-cv-00055-REP
On January 28, 2022, five individuals with GLIC or GLICNY Choice 2, Choice 2.1, California CADE, California Reprice, and/or California Unbundled long-term care insurance policies Fred Haney, Marsha Merrill, Sylvia Rausch, Stephen Swenson, and Alan Wooten (“Named Plaintiffs”), filed a Class Action Complaint (“Complaint”) against Genworth in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, alleging that Genworth intentionally withheld material information from Policyholders with respect to the full scope and magnitude of Genworth’s rate increase action plans and its reliance on Policyholders paying increased rates to pay future claims (the “Complaint”). The Complaint asserted claims for Fraudulent Inducement by Omission and for Declaratory Relief.
Genworth denies any wrongdoing or legal liability for any alleged wrongdoing in connection with any facts or claims that have been or could have been alleged in Named Plaintiffs’ lawsuit, whether on behalf of the Named Plaintiffs or Class Members. Genworth contends that the Named Plaintiffs’ and Class Members’ claims challenged Genworth’s right to increase premiums and thus are barred by the filed-rate doctrine, and that neither Named Plaintiffs nor the putative Class has been injured or is entitled to any relief. The Court has not ruled on the merits of the claims or defenses.
All Parties believe in the merits of their respective claims and defenses. Nevertheless, due to the uncertainties, risks, expenses, and business disruption of continued litigation, the Parties have agreed to settle the lawsuit after voluntary mediation proceedings involving a mediator. The Court approved the Parties’ a Joint Stipulation of Third Amended Class Action Settlement and Release “(Settlement Agreement”) on February 15, 2023. The principal terms of the Settlement Agreement are summarized on this website. The full Settlement Agreement is on file with the Court and available on the Important Documents section of this website.
The attorneys for plaintiffs Fred Haney, Marsha Merrill, Sylvia Rausch, Stephen Swenson, and Alan Wooten have been designated by the Court as “Class Counsel” to represent all Class Members affected by the Settlement Agreement. Class Counsel believes that the Settlement Agreement summarized by this website is fair, reasonable, and adequate and in the best interests of the Class Members.
The following law firms are Class Counsel and represent the Class Members:
Class Counsel | |
---|---|
GOLDMAN SCARLATO & PENNY, P.C. Brian D. Penny 161 Washington Street, Suite 1025 Conshohocken, PA 19428 |
ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP Stuart A. Davidson 120 East Palmetto Park Road, Suite 500 Boca Raton, FL 33432 |
PHELAN PETTY, PLC Jonathan M. Petty 3315 West Broad Street Richmond, VA 23230 |
BERGER MONTAGUE PC Glen L. Abramson 1818 Market Street, Suite 3600 Philadelphia, PA 19103 |
Class Counsel’s Toll-free Number: 1-800-348-6192 |
The Settlement Administrator is Epiq. Epiq’s phone number is 1-855-662-0078; and its mailing address is Haney v. Genworth, P.O. Box 2860, Portland, OR 97208-2860.
Back To TopThe “Class Members” for purposes of this settlement are defined as all Policyholders of GLIC and GLICNY long-term care insurance Choice 2, Choice 2.1, California CADE, California Reprice, and California Unbundled policies, and State variations of those policies in force at any time during the Class Period and issued in any of the fifty (50) States or the District of Columbia (the “States”) excluding: (1) those Policyholders whose policies went into Non-Forfeiture Status or entered a Fully Paid-Up Status prior to January 1, 2014; (2) those Policyholders whose Class Policy is Lapsed and is outside any period Genworth allows for the Class Policy to be automatically reinstated with payment of past due premium, or whose Class Policy has otherwise Terminated, as of the date of the Class Notice; and those Policyholders whose Class Policy is Lapsed and is outside any period Genworth allows for the Class Policy to be automatically reinstated with payment of past due premium or has otherwise Terminated, as of the date the Special Election Letter (defined below) would otherwise be mailed to the Policyholder; (3) those Policyholders who are deceased at any time prior to sending their Special Election Option to Genworth; (4) Genworth’s current officers, directors, and employees as of the date Class Notice is mailed; and (5) Judge Robert E. Payne and his immediate family and staff.
Changes to your policy status or coverage (including, for example, whether your policy lapses or is terminated) may also impact whether or not you are in the proposed settlement class. If your policy lapses after the date of the Class Notice, it must be reinstated within your applicable auto-reinstatement period if you wish to exercise rights and options in the settlement.
Back To TopThe terms of the Settlement Agreement are as follows:
Release: Each member of the Class who does not timely and validly opt out of the Class, will forever release and discharge GLIC and GLICNY (collectively “Genworth”) and each of those entities’ respective affiliates, predecessors, successors, parents, subsidiaries, and, for each of the foregoing, their current, former, and future directors, officers, direct and indirect owners, members, managers, attorneys, representatives, employees, and agents (the “Genworth Released Parties”) of and from any and all known or unknown, contingent or absolute, matured or unmatured, suspected or unsuspected, disclosed or undisclosed, foreseeable or unforeseeable, liquidated or unliquidated, existing or arising in the future, and accrued or unaccrued claims, demands, interest, penalties, fines, and causes of action, that the Named Plaintiffs and Class Members may have from the beginning of time through and including the Final Settlement Date that relate to claims alleged, or that have a reasonable connection with any matter of fact set forth in the Class Action including, but not limited to, any claims relating to rate increases on Class Policies prior to the Final Settlement Date. This release specifically includes any legal or equitable claim arising from or related to any election or policy change made or not made by any Class Members to his or her policy benefits prior to the Final Settlement Date. Named Plaintiffs and Class Members, subject to the exception set forth below, will further release the Genworth Released Parties and Class Counsel from any claims relating to or arising out of the Disclosures or the Special Election Letters the Class Members are provided as part of the Settlement Agreement, including (but not limited to) claims specifically relating to any alleged omissions in the Disclosures or the Special Election Letters or to any decision, or non-decision, to maintain, modify, or give up coverage based on the Disclosures, the Special Election Letters, or the Special Election Options offered. A claim that a Class Member was harmed by an express and intentional misrepresentation: in the completed portion of the Disclosures that currently is bracketed in the template Special Election Letter appended as Appendix D to the Settlement Agreement, in the completed portions of the Special Election Options that are made available to that Class Member that currently are bracketed in the template Special Election Letter, or by the Genworth Released Parties or Class Counsel about the Disclosures, shall not be a Released Claim. A Class Member may pursue such a claim in the Court via complaint or petition within three years of the date the Class Member makes a Special Election or three years of the deadline for the Class Member to make a Special Election, whichever is earlier, provided that, before filing any such claim, the Class Member shall first notify the Parties of the basis for the claim and provide them with a reasonable opportunity to investigate and, if appropriate, remedy the alleged harm.
This Release will not prevent a Class Member from making a claim for benefits under his or her long-term care insurance policy consistent with his or her policy coverage, nor shall it include a Class Member’s challenge or appeal of Genworth’s denial of benefits under his or her Class Policy.
This is only a summary of the actual benefits and release language contained in the Settlement Agreement, which is available on the Important Documents section of this website.
Attorneys’ Fees and Litigation Expenses: Class Counsel will be paid a contingent payment of 15% of certain amounts related to Special Election Options selected by the Class, which shall be no greater than $13,000,000.00. Class Counsel will also receive $39,697.92 for reasonable litigation expenses incurred in this case. None of the attorneys’ fees or litigation expenses will be deducted from payments made by Genworth to Class Members.
These are the only attorneys’ fees and litigation expenses that Class Counsel will be paid as a result of the Settlement. Class Members will not be required to separately pay Class Counsel for any other attorneys’ fees or expenses. Genworth has agreed to pay all fees and expenses separately. These amounts will be paid by Genworth directly to Class Counsel.
This is only a summary of the actual Attorneys’ Fees and Litigation Expenses provisions contained in the Settlement Agreement, which is available on the Important Documents section of this website.
The Special Election Options described on this website are still subject to review by state insurance regulators.
You should also consider the following additional information, which may impact the availability of Special Election Options under this settlement:
Changes to your policy status or coverage (including lapse or termination) may impact whether or not you are in the proposed settlement class and/or whether Special Election Options will be available to you.